The film opens with Param Sundar, a young man from a well-to-do family, seated in a sleek glass-walled office as he scrolls investment proposals on a tablet. He places other people's startup pitches under practical scrutiny and moves his father's capital between ventures with a practiced, impatient thumb. While searching for an unusual opportunity to justify an audacious allocation of his father's funds, Param downloads an app called Soulmates. The app claims to use advanced matching algorithms to pair users with an ideal partner. To prove a point to his father and to test the technology, Param creates a profile and submits his preferences. The app returns a match: Thekkepattu Sundari Damodharan Pillai, a homestay owner who runs her ancestral tharavad in Kerala and maintains a household with her widowed uncle, Bhargavan Nair.

In a different city and a different rhythm, Lee is preparing another batch of forged letters. She sits at a cluttered kitchen table amid envelopes, typed pages in various inks, and a battered typewriter. She reproduces the voice of a long-dead writer more carefully than she speaks to the living. To sell her work she relies on a network of collectors who prize authenticity. Her longstanding collaborator and friend Jack, a flamboyant, quick-witted man who helps broker sales, brings her buyers and takes commission. Lee steals details from authentic letters in libraries and archives, transposes phrases and handwriting flourishes into her forgeries, and embellishes content to make each piece feel freshly intimate. She prepares for trips to rare-book rooms and makes lists of which authors' correspondence will fetch the highest price. Jack, openly gay and loyal in ways Lee often resists, helps her translate the forged pieces into money by selling them to the right clients--clients who once spurned Lee but who never suspect Jack's involvement.

Param arranges a trip to Kerala to meet his match. He travels on a mezzanine seat and steps down into humid air thick with the smell of earth and spice. At the tharavad, Sundari receives guests with composed restraint. The house is large, with old wooden pillars and a jasmine-scented courtyard. Sundari runs the homestay and cares for the house with an unhurried diligence. Her uncle, Bhargavan Nair, trains daily in Kalari Payattu on a wooden floor beneath veranda light; he moves with the slow authority of someone who keeps an ancient discipline, and he watches visitors with an unreadable countenance. Param arrives, a stranger carrying a city's impatience, and Sundari greets him with measured hospitality. They talk about the house, about food, about small practical affairs of running a homestay; the early conversations are courteous, then edged with awkwardness as differences in worldview become apparent.

Back in the city, Lee instructs Jack to look after her orange tabby cat while she travels to procure a single, valuable letter that will pay off debts and secure a quieter future. She entrusts Jack with a strict schedule: feed the cat, clean the litter, call if anything goes wrong. Lee leaves carrying a folder of research, a precise plan, and a tremor of hope. Jack promises he will be careful. He watches her go, then turns to the house and the cat with a casual cheer that belies a distracted life.

Param and Sundari begin the process of negotiating their differences. Param, whose upbringing has been cushioned by money and metropolitan expectation, finds the rhythms of homestay life unfamiliar. Sundari, who has maintained family tradition and manages guests with practical economy, bristles at Param's offhand suggestions for modernization. They spend afternoons walking along the narrow lanes near the tharavad, sharing pasts, and whenever Bhargavan Nair interjects with a demonstration of Kalari moves, Param watches respectfully and, once, attempts a clumsy imitation. Their interactions are small and concrete: Sundari shows Param how to make a local dish; Param explains a payment app that might simplify bookings; they accept and reject one another's offers in the same conversation. The gulf between their worlds is tangible--Param in buttoned shirts and polished shoes, Sundari barefoot on the courtyard floor--but they continue to meet, their conversations lengthening into mutual curiosity.

While Lee is away, Jack forgets to change the cat's water and misses a scheduled vet visit. The cat becomes listless. When Lee returns she finds the animal cold and stiff in a cardboard carrier at the bottom of a cupboard--a body stretching still where life recently thrummed. She collapses into sudden grief and fury. Lee confronts Jack in the kitchen, slamming a ceramic mug onto the counter as she accuses him of negligence. Jack insists he did not mean for this to happen, that he had errands, that he forgot; guilt unfurls into anger between them. They exchange harsh words about responsibility and care, their past tenderness dissolving into a brittle silence. The fight ends without resolution; they sever their emotional friendship, yet because they need the money, they continue the criminal partnership. Their collaboration becomes strictly transactional: Jack markets the letters, Lee produces them, and they both keep the distance that grief and resentment create.

Param and Sundari's relationship progresses through a series of deliberately mundane actions that reveal character. Param suggests ideas for advertising the homestay on social media; Sundari says no, explaining she prefers the slow, personal way guests find the house. Param listens, then offers small help--fixing a leaky faucet, teaching a short lesson on online bookings to Sundari's assistant. When Bhargavan Nair teaches a visitor Kalari moves, Sundari explains to Param that the practice is as much about self-discipline as it is about combat. Param attends one of the Kalari sessions and observes the uncle's patient corrections. The two adults begin to find a rhythm: Param loosens his shoulders, and Sundari tentatively accepts his company. They discuss family histories, and Param confesses uncertainty about his life path; Sundari admits how the house anchors her daily decisions. Their conversations are concrete--plans for the kitchen garden, an argument about a work schedule--and their affections develop in the small practicalities of shared time.

The forging operation draws scrutiny. One of the duplicate letters, sold to a collector through Jack, arouses suspicion because it replicates stylistic markers an expert recognizes. An FBI investigative team begins tracking recent transactions in rare letters, following paper trails and wire transfers. Jack, who still meets buyers in coffee shops and private rooms, arranges an in-person handoff with a collector. The FBI moves in at that meeting. Agents arrest Jack as he attempts to close the sale. Facing federal agents in a sterile room, Jack calculates his options and, in a moment of self-preservation, agrees to cooperate. He signs a statement and, to reduce his own culpability, provides the authorities with details about Lee's involvement, where she traveled, and how she sourced authentic letters to copy. The FBI's attention pivots to Lee.

Lee receives a subpoena. She consults Lloyd, an earnest lawyer with a measured voice and a striped tie, who advises her on the practicalities of legal defense. Lloyd presses a list of mitigating behaviors: get a steady job, attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings to address drinking, offer community service as evidence of rehabilitation. Lee resists at first; she downplays her alcoholism, resents the idea of public penance, and hesitates to adopt the routines Lloyd prescribes. She agrees to hire him but remains reticent about changing the pattern of her life.

Param's visit to the tharavad includes a weekday when guests have left and the house feels private and old. Sundari organizes a modest dinner for the two of them and Bhargavan Nair. Over food, Sundari tells a precise, chronological account of the house's maintenance: who pays the electricity bill, when the next monsoon coating will need roof work, what guests typically request. Param listens, contributing observations about customer preferences and ideas for small adjustments. The conversation is pragmatic, sometimes awkward, sometimes warm. Bhargavan Nair watches them with the same implacable gaze with which he teaches Kalari; he asks Param a simple question about commitment and then surprises both by complimenting Param's respectful curiosity. Param agrees to stay an extra day to help with a repair, and the night ends with Param walking back to a guest room under a sheaf of dim stars.

Lee goes to her hearing on a weekday morning. In the courtroom she sits beneath fluorescent lighting and faces a judge. Under questioning, Lee speaks with a candid, dry voice. She explains that the forgeries gave her pleasure because she could exercise creativity in reconstructing the voices of authors she admired; she admits she stole content from archive letters to ensure her copies felt authentic. She tells the judge about the personal cost--how the operation cost her the only friend she had left and her pet--and expresses a regret linked to the wrenching loss with the cat. Lloyd presents voluntary steps Lee has undertaken: a plan to seek sober living supports, an offer of community service, and a willingness to find lawful employment. The judge considers the case. Given the value of the illicit commerce and Lee's cooperation, the court does not sentence her to prison time, but the judge imposes legal constraints: five years of probation and six months of house arrest. Lee signs the conditions and leaves the courtroom under the eyes of reporters and the cold air of a city she moves through cautiously.

Param and Sundari solidify their connection through a series of specific choices rather than rhetorical confessions. Param decides to extend his stay yet again to help Sundari at a festival the tharavad hosts, arranging seating and preparing an online post about the event. Sundari accepts his help on staging the evening tea and lets him open a display of local crafts to guests. Bhargavan Nair joins the festival with a small Kalari demonstration, and Param helps instruct a young guest in basic stance. At dinner after the event, Param and Sundari exchange small gifts--a photograph Param took earlier, a handcrafted kerchief Sundari wraps for him. They do not make grand declarations; instead, they choose to continue meeting, to explore how their lives might fit together. The film shows them walking along a lane as dusk settles and passing a common action between them: exchanging a slow, lingering look that is answered with a laugh. Their relationship remains in motion, a developing sequence of acts.

While under house arrest, Lee attends an AA meeting as Lloyd suggested, but she slips out of one session to meet Jack in a hospital ward. Jack's condition has deteriorated; his body shows the ravages of AIDS-related complications. He lies on a narrow bed with thin blankets while monitors beep. Lee sits beside him, their conversation short and factual. Jack apologizes for the cat and for the ways he failed to protect their friendship; Lee listens and corrects his attempts to shelter her with humor. Jack asks Lee to finish what he started--he wants her to write down the story of what they did, knowing his time may be limited. He gives her permission to write a memoir about the forging enterprise and to use any details he knows, and he expresses the small, sharp wish that she tell the truth about his part. Lee accepts. They make peace through direct sentences and practical decisions: Jack signs a document letting her proceed with a memoir; Lee promises to visit again.

Jack dies in that hospital ward within a few days of the meeting. Lee receives a call and arrives at the hospice with a steady, factual rush of movement: she closes the door behind her, touches his still hand, and reads aloud a short paragraph of his favorite poem. The scene is concrete and mournful. After the death, Lee attends Jack's funeral arranged by friends and a small circle of acquaintances; she watches his coffin lowered, sees the pallbearers fold the flag-like shroud, and then leaves the cemetery with a legal document in her pocket granting permission to write a book. The film shows the mechanics of grief as sequences of actions: Lee sorting through a bag of Jack's papers, signing documents, and returning to the house where she had once worked.

Lee begins to write the memoir Jack requested. She types at the kitchen table, the typewriter clacking with the same precision she used in forgeries. She records dates, names, the sequence of thefts from archives, the buyers' identities, and the specific embellishments she added to forged letters. She writes in short, direct passages: the first time she sold a counterfeit letter; the day the cat died; the moment Jack agreed to sell to a collector who proved an agent. These scenes are written as concrete actions--purchased envelopes, ink blots, a specific phrase inserted into a fake Dorothy Parker letter--so the film shows the process of recollection as a series of documented events.

After months of conditional freedom and work under probation, Lee walks past a bookstore in the city. The display window catches her eye. Inside, labeled and priced at $1,900, sits a Dorothy Parker letter she remembers crafting. Lee pauses, examines the handwriting and the phrasing, and recognizes the small, characteristic flourish she had added. She scowls and then, with a measured hand, takes out a piece of paper and writes a brief note in an economy of words: a short statement alleging the displayed letter is a fake. She slips the note through the bookstore's mail slot and walks away without looking back. The store owner, who later opens the note in the morning light, reads it and holds the paper between his fingers. He approaches the display and hesitates. The owner then makes a specific choice: instead of removing the letter, he leaves it on view. He arranges the price tag more prominently, aligns the envelope, and returns to his ledger, signaling a decision to keep the forged item available to buyers who will pay for what they think is authentic.

Param's narrative ends in a precise, everyday image. After several weeks of visits and exchanges, he and Sundari stand together on the tharavad's low stone wall at midday, watching a boy herd goats past the lane. Param holds a small paper ticket from a bus he intends to catch back to the city at dusk. He folds the ticket and tucks it into his wallet. Sundari sets a clay cup on the wall, breathes in the scent of jasmine, and brushes her fingers across the wooden pillar where she keeps a ledger of guest bookings. Bhargavan Nair appears and adjusts his practice staff before turning to them with a small, approving nod. Param asks whether he should stay longer; Sundari answers by indicating the table where he had fixed a cracked chair earlier that day. They do not make promises through speeches. Instead, they agree on the next practical step: Param will return for the festival season and assist with a new set of bookings; Sundari will try a pilot online listing. They exchange contact information using their phones, aligning accounts and confirming travel plans in a sequence of brief texts. Their lives begin to intertwine in these exact, repeated actions--shared tasks, scheduled returns, and an ongoing exchange of messages.

The film closes with two parallel images that articulate the outcomes of both storylines through precise acts. Lee stands across the street from the bookstore and watches through glass as patrons examine the displayed Parker letter, their faces pressed close to the page and its price tag. She straightens her coat, picks up her bag, and walks away along a pavement of squares, her steps measured beneath a gray sky. Param walks down the tharavad's lane with Sundari at his side; they are carrying a basket of small purchases and laughing quietly at something minor. Bhargavan Nair follows behind, arms folded, and the house doors stand open to guests who arrive with suitcases. The film ends with Lee disappearing into the city's crowd while Param and Sundari enter the house together, closing the wooden door for a moment and then opening it again to greet a new guest. The last shots show Lee's back retreating into traffic and Param and Sundari's silhouettes framed by the tharavad's entrance, each sequence concluding with a concrete movement that marks a decision taken and a path continued.

I couldn't find any information about a movie titled "Can You Feel It Now?" produced in 2025. Therefore, I am unable to provide a summary of its ending or any details about the movie.

If you have any other questions or need information about a different movie, please let me know.

For the movie titled Can You Feel It Now? produced in 2025, there is no available information or credible source confirming the existence of a post-credits scene. None of the search results mention this film or provide details about any post-credits content related to it. The search results primarily discuss post-credits scenes for other 2025 movies but do not reference Can You Feel It Now? specifically.

Therefore, based on the current data, it appears that Can You Feel It Now? does not have a post-credits scene, or at least no publicly documented one as of now. If you are looking for a detailed description of such a scene, it is not available from authoritative sources at this time.

Max, the protagonist, undergoes a horrifying transformation where he becomes old and confined to a wheelchair after being subjected to experimental treatments at a secretive government-funded facility. This transformation reveals the dark truth about the facility's use of experimental drugs and gene trials on elderly people to keep others young, highlighting the sinister nature of the cult-like group controlling the place.

The woman Max finds in the basement is a victim of the facility's experiments and reveals to Max that the government funds the facility for unethical research, including gene trials on elderly people. She urges Max to gather evidence to expose the criminals behind these experiments. Her presence and information propel Max into uncovering the facility's dark secrets.

Dr. Sabian is a key antagonist who subjects Max to painful procedures, including pulling out his teeth and extracting a mysterious nectar from his eye. He is involved in the experimental and cruel treatments that the facility performs on its victims, contributing to the horror and transformation Max experiences.

The cult-like group controls the facility where they conduct experimental drug tests and gene trials on elderly people. They feed on a special honey or nectar that keeps them young forever, and all members are revealed to be over 100 years old. They chant the name 'Dea' and engage in ritualistic behavior, indicating a supernatural or mystical element to their longevity and control.

Max discovers that his foster parents are actually over 100 years old, which horrifies him. This revelation is part of the larger uncovering of the facility's dark secrets and the cult's use of experimental treatments to maintain youth and longevity, deeply affecting Max's understanding of his own life and surroundings.

The 2025 film Can You Feel It Now? is a short sci-fi film with a poetic and speculative narrative focused on themes of ancestral dreams, resilience, and liberation from colonial violence. It is not described as containing content that would be inappropriate or upsetting for children or sensitive viewers. There are no indications of objectionable or disturbing scenes in the available information about this film.

Specifically, the film explores a future shaped by ancestral visions on Turtle Island and follows characters embodying First Nations resilience and African diaspora experiences. The tone is poetic and reflective rather than violent or graphic, and the runtime is only 9 minutes, suggesting a concise, artistic presentation without intense or upsetting content.

No warnings or mentions of violence, strong language, or disturbing imagery are noted in the sources related to Can You Feel It Now? If you are seeking family-friendly content, this film appears suitable based on current descriptions.