What is the plot?

Sorry, we aren't able to watch and write up a full detailed plot yet. Check back in a few days.

What is the ending?

In the ending of "Cherry 2000," Sam Treadwell successfully retrieves a replacement chip for his malfunctioning Cherry 2000 robot. He realizes that his emotional connection to the robot was superficial and that he has developed a genuine bond with the tough and resourceful woman, E. Johnson, who helped him on his journey. The film concludes with Sam choosing to embrace a more authentic human relationship, leaving behind the artificiality of his Cherry 2000.

As the climax of "Cherry 2000" unfolds, we find Sam Treadwell, played by David Andrews, in a tense standoff with the menacing gang led by the ruthless Lester. After a series of harrowing encounters, Sam and E. Johnson, portrayed by Melanie Griffith, manage to infiltrate the gang's hideout. The atmosphere is thick with danger as they navigate through the dilapidated remnants of a post-apocalyptic world, filled with rusted cars and crumbling buildings.

In a pivotal moment, Sam retrieves the chip that will restore his Cherry 2000 robot. However, as he holds the small, vital piece of technology in his hand, he experiences a profound moment of reflection. The journey he has taken with E. has opened his eyes to the limitations of his previous relationship with the Cherry 2000. He begins to understand that the emotional connection he thought he had with the robot was merely a projection of his desires, rather than a true bond.

As they escape the gang's lair, the tension reaches its peak. E. Johnson, who has been a fierce protector and guide throughout their adventure, stands by Sam's side. The chemistry between them has grown, and it becomes evident that their relationship has evolved into something deeper than mere companionship. They share a moment of vulnerability, acknowledging the struggles they have faced together and the strength they have found in one another.

In the final scenes, Sam makes a decisive choice. Instead of returning to the Cherry 2000, he discards the chip, symbolizing his rejection of the artificial and his embrace of the real. He turns to E. and expresses his desire to pursue a genuine relationship with her. The film closes with a sense of hope and renewal, as Sam and E. walk away together, leaving behind the remnants of a world obsessed with artificiality.

The fate of the main characters is clear: Sam Treadwell chooses authenticity over artificiality, while E. Johnson, who has proven herself to be a capable and resilient partner, finds a new connection with Sam. The film ends on a note of optimism, suggesting that true human relationships, with all their complexities and imperfections, are far more valuable than any manufactured ideal.

Is there a post-credit scene?

The movie "Cherry 2000," produced in 1987, does not have a post-credit scene. The film concludes with a resolution to the main storyline, focusing on the relationship between the protagonist, Sam Treadwell, and the human woman, E. Johnson, who helps him find a replacement for his malfunctioning Cherry 2000 robot. The ending emphasizes themes of love, connection, and the contrast between artificial and genuine relationships, but there are no additional scenes or content after the credits roll.

What is the significance of the Cherry 2000 model in the film?

The Cherry 2000 model represents the idealized partner for the protagonist, David, embodying the perfect blend of beauty, obedience, and emotional support. David's attachment to Cherry highlights his struggle with real human relationships and his desire for a flawless companion.

Who is E. Johnson and what role does she play in the story?

E. Johnson, played by Melanie Griffith, is a tough, resourceful woman who becomes David's guide and protector on his quest to find a replacement for his broken Cherry 2000. Her character embodies resilience and independence, contrasting with the submissive nature of the Cherry model.

What challenges does David face in the wasteland while searching for a new Cherry 2000?

David encounters various dangers in the wasteland, including hostile scavengers and treacherous terrain. These challenges force him to confront his own limitations and the reality of human relationships, as he relies on E. Johnson's skills to navigate the perils of the post-apocalyptic world.

How does David's perception of love and relationships evolve throughout the film?

Initially, David views love through the lens of his idealized Cherry 2000, but as he journeys with E. Johnson, he begins to understand the complexities and imperfections of real relationships. This evolution is marked by his growing appreciation for E.'s strength and individuality.

What is the significance of the final confrontation with the gang in the film?

The final confrontation with the gang symbolizes David's transformation from a passive consumer of idealized love to an active participant in his own life. It represents his acceptance of the chaos and unpredictability of real relationships, culminating in a decisive moment where he chooses authenticity over fantasy.

Is this family friendly?

"Cherry 2000," produced in 1987, is not considered family-friendly due to several potentially objectionable elements. Here are some aspects that might be upsetting for children or sensitive viewers:

  1. Violence: The film features action sequences that include gunfights and physical confrontations, which may be intense and graphic for younger audiences.

  2. Sexual Content: There are scenes that involve sexual innuendos and suggestive situations, including nudity and adult themes that may not be appropriate for children.

  3. Dystopian Themes: The film presents a post-apocalyptic world that can be unsettling, with themes of loss, loneliness, and the breakdown of society.

  4. Mature Language: The dialogue includes profanity and adult language that may not be suitable for younger viewers.

  5. Emotional Struggles: Characters experience deep emotional turmoil, including themes of obsession and the quest for love, which may be complex for children to understand.

These elements contribute to the film's overall tone and may not be suitable for a younger audience or those sensitive to such content.