Roman J. Israel, Esq. (2017)

Sorry, we aren't able to watch and write up a full detailed plot yet. Check back in a few days.

In the ending of "Roman J. Israel, Esq.," Roman faces the consequences of his actions after a series of moral dilemmas. He ultimately decides to plead guilty to a crime he committed, accepting responsibility for his choices. The film concludes with Roman reflecting on his life and the impact of his decisions, leaving his future uncertain.

As the film approaches its conclusion, we find Roman J. Israel, a brilliant but socially awkward defense attorney, grappling with the fallout from his recent actions. After a series of events that led him to compromise his principles, Roman is now at a crossroads.

Scene by scene, the tension builds. Roman, having been involved in a controversial case that led to the death of a man, is confronted by his own conscience. He had initially taken a stand for justice, but the pressures of the legal world and his financial struggles have pushed him into morally ambiguous territory.

In a pivotal moment, Roman meets with his former mentor's partner, George Pierce, who has been trying to guide him through the complexities of the legal system. George, played by Colin Farrell, is a pragmatic lawyer who has been trying to help Roman navigate his new reality. However, their relationship is strained as Roman's idealism clashes with George's more cynical view of the law.

As the story unfolds, Roman's internal conflict intensifies. He is haunted by the choices he has made, particularly the decision to take a plea deal that would involve him admitting guilt for a crime he committed in a moment of desperation. This decision weighs heavily on him, as he has always prided himself on his integrity and commitment to justice.

In the final scenes, Roman is seen preparing for his court appearance. He is visibly anxious, his mind racing with thoughts of what this plea will mean for his future. The courtroom is tense, filled with the weight of his decision. As he stands before the judge, Roman's demeanor shifts from uncertainty to a quiet resolve. He acknowledges his wrongdoing, accepting the consequences of his actions.

After the hearing, Roman walks out of the courthouse, a mix of relief and sorrow etched on his face. He understands that he has lost a part of himself in the process, but he also recognizes the importance of accountability. The film closes with Roman alone, contemplating his next steps in a world that feels increasingly alien to him.

The fate of the main characters is stark. Roman, having pleaded guilty, faces an uncertain future, possibly involving prison time. George, who had tried to help Roman, is left to reflect on the complexities of their relationship and the harsh realities of the legal system. The film ends on a somber note, emphasizing the themes of justice, morality, and the personal cost of one's choices.

The movie "Roman J. Israel, Esq." does not have a post-credit scene. After the film concludes, the credits roll without any additional scenes or content following them. The film ends on a poignant note, focusing on the character of Roman J. Israel and his journey, leaving the audience to reflect on the themes of justice, morality, and personal sacrifice that permeate the story.

Roman J. Israel, a brilliant but socially awkward defense attorney, is deeply motivated by his commitment to justice and his belief in the importance of fighting for the underprivileged. His passion for civil rights and his idealistic view of the legal system drive him to take on the case of a man wrongfully convicted of a crime, seeing it as a chance to make a meaningful impact.

Initially, Roman sees George Pierce as a mentor and ally, someone who can help him navigate the complexities of the legal world. However, as the story progresses, Roman becomes increasingly disillusioned with George's pragmatic approach to law, which often prioritizes profit over justice. Their relationship becomes strained as Roman's idealism clashes with George's more cynical worldview.

Roman grapples with significant internal conflict as he is forced to confront the compromises he must make in order to survive in a legal system that often prioritizes winning over justice. His idealism is challenged when he realizes that the legal profession can be corrupt and self-serving, leading him to question his own values and the sacrifices he is willing to make.

Maya serves as a grounding presence in Roman's life, representing a connection to the world outside of his legal battles. She is a passionate activist who shares Roman's commitment to social justice, and her encouragement helps him to see the importance of balancing his ideals with practical realities. Their relationship also highlights Roman's struggle with intimacy and vulnerability.

Roman's past, particularly his experiences growing up in a racially charged environment and his long-standing dedication to civil rights, profoundly influences his actions. His history of working in a small, idealistic law firm shapes his worldview and fuels his determination to fight for justice, even as he faces the harsh realities of a flawed legal system.

"Roman J. Israel, Esq." is not particularly family-friendly and contains several elements that may be objectionable or upsetting for children or sensitive viewers. Here are some aspects to consider:

1. Language: The film includes strong language, with frequent use of profanity that may not be suitable for younger audiences.

2. Violence: There are scenes that depict violence, including a significant moment involving a brutal attack that is both shocking and intense.

3. Themes of Injustice: The film explores heavy themes such as systemic racism, legal corruption, and moral dilemmas, which may be difficult for younger viewers to fully understand or process.

4. Mental Health: The protagonist, Roman, struggles with his mental health, showcasing moments of anxiety and emotional distress that could be unsettling for some viewers.

5. Ethical Dilemmas: The narrative delves into complex ethical issues surrounding the legal system and personal integrity, which may be challenging for children to grasp.

6. Death: There are references to death and loss that contribute to the film's somber tone, which may be upsetting for sensitive viewers.

Overall, the film's mature themes and content make it more suitable for adult audiences.