What is the plot?

In the episode "The Ninth Seat," the story begins with President Tom Kirkman facing the aftermath of the recent political turmoil. He is still grappling with the implications of his presidency and the challenges that come with it. The episode opens with Kirkman in a meeting with his staff, discussing the upcoming confirmation hearing for a new Supreme Court Justice. The tension is palpable as they prepare for the political maneuvering that will ensue.

As the meeting progresses, Kirkman learns that there is a vacancy on the Supreme Court, and he must nominate a candidate. He is advised to choose someone who can garner bipartisan support. Kirkman feels the weight of the decision, knowing that it could significantly impact his presidency and the political landscape. He is determined to make a choice that reflects his values and the needs of the country.

Meanwhile, Hannah Wells, the FBI agent, is continuing her investigation into the conspiracy that led to the attack on the Capitol. She is driven by a sense of justice and a desire to uncover the truth. In this episode, she receives a lead that points her toward a potential connection between the conspiracy and a powerful political figure. Her determination to follow this lead puts her at odds with her superiors, who are more focused on the political ramifications than the truth.

As Kirkman deliberates over his nomination, he meets with various candidates, weighing their qualifications and political affiliations. He is particularly drawn to a candidate who embodies his ideals but realizes that this choice may not be politically expedient. The pressure mounts as he consults with his advisors, who have differing opinions on the best course of action. Kirkman's internal conflict is evident as he struggles to balance his principles with the harsh realities of political strategy.

In a parallel storyline, Emily Rhodes, Kirkman's Chief of Staff, is dealing with her own challenges. She is tasked with managing the political fallout from Kirkman's decisions and must navigate the complex relationships within the administration. Emily's loyalty to Kirkman is tested as she faces pressure from both sides of the political aisle. Her emotional state fluctuates as she tries to support the president while also protecting her own career.

As the confirmation hearing approaches, Kirkman makes a bold decision to nominate a candidate who is not the safest choice politically. He believes this nominee represents the values he stands for, and he hopes to inspire the nation with his choice. This decision is met with mixed reactions from his staff and political allies, leading to heated discussions about the implications of his choice.

Hannah's investigation takes a critical turn when she uncovers evidence that links the conspiracy to a high-ranking official. This revelation heightens the stakes for her, as she realizes that she is getting closer to the truth but also putting herself in danger. Her determination to expose the conspiracy drives her to take risks that could jeopardize her safety and career.

As the confirmation hearing begins, tensions rise in the Senate. Kirkman watches anxiously as his nominee faces tough questioning from senators. The atmosphere is charged with political rivalry, and Kirkman's choice is scrutinized from all angles. The hearing becomes a battleground for opposing political ideologies, and Kirkman's resolve is tested as he witnesses the fierce debate unfold.

During the hearing, unexpected revelations come to light, causing a shift in the dynamics. Kirkman's nominee is challenged on past decisions and affiliations, leading to a tense exchange that threatens to derail the confirmation process. Kirkman's emotional investment in his nominee is evident as he grapples with the potential fallout from the hearing.

In the climax of the episode, Hannah confronts the high-ranking official she believes is involved in the conspiracy. This confrontation is fraught with tension, as she demands answers and risks exposing herself to danger. The stakes are high, and Hannah's determination to seek justice drives her to confront the powerful figure directly.

The episode concludes with Kirkman reflecting on the events of the day. The confirmation hearing has left him shaken, and he is left to ponder the implications of his decisions. Meanwhile, Hannah's investigation continues to unfold, setting the stage for further revelations and challenges in the episodes to come. The emotional weight of the episode lingers as both Kirkman and Hannah navigate their respective battles in the complex world of politics and justice.

What is the ending?

In the ending of "The Ninth Seat," President Tom Kirkman faces a critical moment as he navigates the political landscape of the Senate confirmation hearings for his nominee to the Supreme Court. The episode culminates in a tense vote that ultimately leads to the confirmation of his nominee, but not without significant challenges and personal sacrifices along the way.

As the episode concludes, Kirkman reflects on the political maneuvering and the personal toll it has taken on him and those around him. The fate of key characters, including Kirkman, his Chief of Staff Emily Rhodes, and his political adversary Senator Peter MacLeish, is left hanging in a delicate balance, setting the stage for future conflicts and developments.


As the episode "The Ninth Seat" unfolds, we find President Tom Kirkman in the midst of a politically charged atmosphere. The Senate is preparing for a crucial vote on his Supreme Court nominee, and the stakes are incredibly high. Kirkman, portrayed with a mix of determination and vulnerability, is acutely aware that this vote could define his presidency and his ability to govern effectively.

Scene by scene, the tension builds. The episode opens with Kirkman in the Oval Office, discussing strategy with his Chief of Staff, Emily Rhodes. She is visibly anxious, knowing that the opposition is fierce and that the confirmation process is fraught with political gamesmanship. Kirkman reassures her, but the weight of the moment is palpable. He understands that the nominee, who is a woman of color and a progressive choice, represents not just a judicial appointment but a broader ideological battle.

As the day progresses, we see Kirkman engaging with various senators, trying to sway their votes. Each interaction is charged with underlying motives; some senators are swayed by personal connections, while others are driven by party loyalty. Kirkman's earnestness shines through, but he also grapples with the reality of political compromise. He is forced to confront the fact that not everyone will support his vision, and this realization weighs heavily on him.

Meanwhile, Emily is working tirelessly behind the scenes, coordinating with the nominee and ensuring that the administration's messaging is on point. Her dedication is evident, but she also faces her own challenges, particularly in dealing with the fallout from previous political decisions. The emotional strain on her character is evident as she balances her loyalty to Kirkman with the pressures of the political landscape.

As the Senate hearing approaches, the atmosphere becomes increasingly charged. Kirkman's political rival, Senator Peter MacLeish, is a looming presence, representing the opposition that seeks to undermine Kirkman's authority. The tension between them is palpable, and MacLeish's motivations are shrouded in ambiguity, leaving viewers questioning his true intentions.

The climax of the episode arrives during the Senate vote. The chamber is filled with senators, each casting their votes with a mix of conviction and trepidation. Kirkman watches from the gallery, his heart racing as the results are announced. The vote is close, and the outcome hangs in the balance. Each vote is a reflection of the political alliances and personal stakes involved, and the emotional weight of the moment is felt by all.

In the end, the nominee is confirmed, a victory for Kirkman that comes with its own set of complications. As the senators applaud, Kirkman's expression is a mix of relief and contemplation. He knows that this victory is just one battle in a larger war, and the political landscape will continue to shift beneath his feet.

The episode closes with Kirkman reflecting on the day's events, surrounded by his closest advisors. The emotional toll of the political maneuvering is evident on their faces, and the weight of leadership is a heavy burden. Each character is left to ponder their role in the unfolding drama of governance, setting the stage for future conflicts and developments in Kirkman's presidency.

In summary, the fates of the main characters are intertwined with the political outcomes of the day. Kirkman emerges victorious but aware of the challenges that lie ahead. Emily remains a steadfast ally, though she is burdened by the complexities of their political reality. MacLeish, while momentarily sidelined, continues to represent a significant threat to Kirkman's administration, leaving viewers anticipating the next chapter in this intricate political saga.

Is there a post-credit scene?

In "The Ninth Seat," the 17th episode of Designated Survivor's first season, there is no post-credit scene. The episode concludes without any additional scenes after the credits roll. The focus remains on the main narrative and character developments throughout the episode, particularly surrounding President Tom Kirkman and the political dynamics at play.

What role does the Ninth Seat play in the context of the episode?

In 'The Ninth Seat', the Ninth Seat refers to the vacant position on the President's Cabinet that becomes a focal point of political maneuvering. The episode explores the implications of filling this seat, highlighting the power struggles and alliances within the administration.

How does President Kirkman handle the pressure of selecting a new Cabinet member?

President Kirkman feels the weight of responsibility as he navigates the political landscape to choose a new Cabinet member. He grapples with the need for loyalty versus the necessity of expertise, reflecting his internal conflict and desire to maintain unity within his administration.

What is the significance of the character of Emily Rhodes in this episode?

Emily Rhodes plays a crucial role as Kirkman's Chief of Staff, providing him with counsel and support. In this episode, her loyalty is tested as she faces pressure from various factions, showcasing her dedication to Kirkman and her strategic thinking in the political arena.

How does the episode explore the theme of loyalty among the Cabinet members?

The episode delves into the theme of loyalty as various Cabinet members vie for the Ninth Seat. Their motivations are revealed through their actions and dialogues, illustrating the complexities of political alliances and the personal stakes involved in their decisions.

What challenges does Kirkman face from the opposition regarding the Ninth Seat?

Kirkman faces significant challenges from the opposition party, who are eager to exploit any misstep in his selection process for the Ninth Seat. This pressure forces him to confront not only external political threats but also the internal dynamics of his own team, heightening the tension throughout the episode.

Is this family friendly?

In "The Ninth Seat," episode 17 of Designated Survivor, there are several elements that may be considered objectionable or upsetting for children or sensitive viewers:

  1. Political Tension: The episode features intense political discussions and confrontations that may be difficult for younger viewers to understand or process.

  2. Violence and Threats: There are scenes that involve threats of violence and discussions about terrorism, which could be distressing.

  3. Emotional Conflict: Characters experience significant emotional turmoil, including feelings of betrayal, fear, and anxiety, which may resonate deeply and be unsettling.

  4. Mature Themes: The episode touches on themes of power struggles, moral dilemmas, and the consequences of political decisions, which may be complex for younger audiences.

  5. Character Struggles: Some characters face personal crises and moral conflicts that could evoke strong emotional responses.

These elements contribute to a narrative that may not be suitable for all children or sensitive viewers, as they deal with serious and mature themes.